> Google is now requiring an API key in order to access YouTube Data web Memory is a little hazy, but IIRC the problem had to do with Minitube's It's been a year or so since I tried to get Minitube working, so my
#MUSICTUBE UBUNTU INSTALL#
> I could never install a working version of minitube. But it looks like Dyne expressed an intention to release a new version of Dyne:Bolic based off Devuan, since it's listed under "upcoming distributions" here: which made me think that if and when Heads is added to the list, it would be a replacement for Dyne:Bolic.
#MUSICTUBE UBUNTU FREE#
> "probably the final release before heads is ready to apply for the GNU free distribution list" The Dyne folks have been working on Heads (a libre replacement for the Tails live distro), which last had a beta release a year ago. The other is Dyne:Bolic, which hasn't had a release since 2011. One was Musix which was recently retired from the list, as it's no longer in active development.
Historically there were two FSF-endorsed distros that aimed to provide a multimedia studio out-of-the-box. But I would love to see an up-to-date libre distro (or flavour) targeting the needs of the multimedia producers who use distros like UbuntuStudio, Artix, or AV Linux. I agree with chaosmonk that Trisquel is intended as a common-or-garden desktop distro, not a multimedia studio. Graphical tool for configuring and routing JACK? Do they use qjackctl, or do they have another It doesn't look like Ubuntu's repo or Ubuntu Studio's PPA includeĬadence and Catia. Do they use a JACK-pulseaudio bridge, or do they avoid pulseaudio Laptop's soundcard as opposed to an audio interface)? Did JACK work out of the box (especially if you tried it with a Are you using the LTS version based on 18.04, or the newest version Since it sounds like you're using Ubuntu Studio, can you tell me Impressed) and either build Abrowser with JACK support or run it withĪpulse so that it does not require pulseaudio. JACK working out-of-the box even with laptop soundcards I'll be very Then we could borrow Ubuntu Studio's default configuration (if they have KXStudio has a similar PPA from which we might at least want to bring in Trisquel 8, but might be an option for Trisquel 9. LTS versions of Ubuntu for three years, so it's too late to do this for It looks like Ubuntu Studio does have a backports PPA from which weĬould bring in some newer packages, except that the PPA only supports Releases, so it has a six-month release cycle, but Trisquel doesn't have
Ubuntu Studio is based on Ubuntu's short term
#MUSICTUBE UBUNTU PLUS#
Ubuntu's two-year release cycle plus a delay. I have thought about the idea of a separate Trisquel Studio flavorĪnalogous to Ubuntu Studio. Instead of pulseaudio, which most users *really* do not need. Like a low-latency kernel, which most users do not need, and JACK I don't think that it should by default, since this would mean things I would love it if Trisquel would come preconfigured with very good
0 kommentar(er)
